The battle between doctors and lawyers moved into the state's highest court today, as attorneys presented three proposed constitutional amendments for the Nov. 2 ballot, and physicians argued why they were inappropriate. The Supreme Court's role is limited - justices can opine only on whether an amendment meets constitutional single-subject requirements and whether the ballot language accurately describes what the amendment will do. As is its custom, the court didn't rule right away but will issue a written opinion later this summer.
Posted by Editor at June 8, 2004 02:22 PM